Mot(s) clés libre(s) : logement social (Asie de l'Est), marché de l'immobilier (Asie de l'Est), mixité sociale, politique du logement (21ème siècle)

Mot(s) clés libre(s) : économie du logement, logement social, marché mmobilier, mixité sociale, offices de l'habitation, politique du logement, politique sociale (logement), ségrégation urbaine, sociologie urbaine

Implementing "Mixité" : discourses and experiences of politicians and other stakeholders. Round Table [version en anglais avec deux interventions traduites en français en simultané]. In "Mixité : an urban and housing issue? Mixing people, housing and activities as urban challenge of the future", 23ème colloque international de l'European Network for Housing Research (ENHR), organisé pen simultanéar le Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire Solidarités, Sociétés, Territoires (LISST) à l'Université Toulouse II-Le Mirail, 5-8 juillet 2011. Avec :- Jean-Christophe Giesbert (chairman of Giesbert & Associés)- Vincent Renard (Institut du Développement Durable et des Relations Internationales, IDDRI)- Barbara Allen (Laboratoire Sociologie Urbaine Générative / CTBS)- François Geindre (Général inspector, General Council CGPE)- Béatrix Mora (Deputy director at the Social Union for Housing)- Stéphane Carassou (chairman of Toulouse-Habitat, deputy director of the Urban Community).>> La traduction des deux premières interventions est assurée par Mme Solange Hibbs (directrice du Département Centre de Traduction, d'Interprétation et de Médiation linguistique (CETIM) de l'université Toulouse II-Le Mirail, membre de l'Association Internationale des Interprètes de Conférence -AIIC).
Mot(s) clés libre(s) : économie du logement, logement social, marché immobilier, mixité sociale, offices de l'habitation, politique du logement, politique sociale (logement), ségrégation urbaine, sociologie urbaine

La cérémonie dite des "cheveux maillés", présente à l’île de La Réunion dans la majeure partie de la population, permet d’observer comment, au travers des différentes versions d’un rite de la petite enfance, les réunionnais affirment, par la recherche puis le refus d’une mémoire ancestrale, une nouvelle identité créole. Cette pratique rituelle apparaît comme le support d’une gestion de l’ethnicité particulière qui tient compte des diverses origines des habitants de l’île par la manifestation possible d’ancêtres issus des différents groupes en présence. Mais au delà de ce "marquage ancestral ", la pluralité des communautés concernées exprime la mixité, l’interpénétration des différents groupes, et révèle un processus de créolisation qui reconnaît les données issues des différentes origines ethniques des réunionnais, les intègre et les "mixe" selon un modèle nouveau, original et syncrétique.
Mot(s) clés libre(s) : danse, Sévé Mayé, rasage, deviner, malbar, baptème, vierge noire, mixité ethnique, ancêtre, chant, cheveux maillés, rituel thérapeutique, musique, maladie, religion, vidéo, Réunion, syncrétisme, film ethnographique, petite enfance, devin guérisseur, Sainte-Marie

Mot(s) clés libre(s) : discrimination dans le logement, exclusion sociale, logement social, mixité sociale, politique du logement, quartiers pauvres, ségrégation urbaine

Social Mix Policies and Research: Finding the "Right Balance" [version avec traduction simultanée en français] / Sako Musterd. [version doublée en français] In "Mixité : an urban and housing issue? Mixing people, housing and activities as urban challenge of the future", 23ème colloque international de l'European Network for Housing Research (ENHR), organisé par le Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire Solidarités, Sociétés, Territoires (LISST) à l'Université Toulouse II-Le Mirail, 5-8 juillet 2011.Plénière 1: Mixité, diversity: pertinent notions?, 6 juillet 2011.‘Social mixing’ has been embraced by several governments as a remedy for urban social problems, or perhaps as an instrument to address other urban issues as well. It has become a part of strategies to ‘restructure’, ‘revitalize’ and ‘regenerate’ urban areas. However, social mixing initiatives, and the urban poverty discourse to which these initiatives are connected, have also been subject to substantial critiques. Many academics have challenged the assumptions underlying social mixing strategies, as well as the way social mix policies are expected to translate into positive outcomes for residents. There is also criticism focused on not paying attention to the negative sides of social mixing, to broken social networks, spillover effects, and the populations that become excluded from ‘socially mixed neighbourhoods’. Nevertheless, there also is a body of academic literature that is taken very seriously, which shows or advocates that there indeed seem to be positive impacts of social mix strategies. Various recent large-scale neighbourhood effect studies support these viewpoints. These studies argue that living among poor people perpetuates individual poverty, whereas middle-class neighbours provide benefits. These findings thus seem to justify policy efforts to intervene in the social makeup of poor neighbourhoods. This "paper" reflects on these contrasting views, opinions, and findings and tries to find the answer to the question what the ‘right balance’ actually is.>> La traduction simultanée en français est assurée par un interprète de l'Association Internationale des Interprètes de Conférence (AIIC).
Mot(s) clés libre(s) : discrimination dans le logement, exclusion sociale, logement social, mixité sociale, politique du logement, quartiers pauvres, ségrégation urbaine

Mot(s) clés libre(s) : logement social, mixité sociale, offices publics d'habitation, politique de l'habitat, politique du logement, politique sociale, sociologie du logement

International perspectives on social enterprise and hybridity in housing organisations: présentation de la plénière [version française] / David Mullins. In "Mixité : an urban and housing issue? Mixing people, housing and activities as urban challenge of the future", 23ème colloque international de l'European Network for Housing Research (ENHR), organisé par le Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire Solidarités, Sociétés, Territoires (LISST) à l'Université Toulouse II-Le Mirail, 5-8 juillet 2011.This session draws on work for a Special Issue of Housing Studies to stimulate debate on the implications (theoretical and practical) of the growth of social enterprise and hybrid models of housing provision. Three of the authors of papers produced for the special issue (abstracts for which are included in this brochure) will review the increasing emphasis on social enterprise and hybrid models in housing organisations and the delivery of social and affordable housing in Europe, the United States and Australia. Social enterprise models have been widely promoted in recent years by both state policies and civil society interests in many countries. Social enterprises are often characterised by hybrid formal institutional characteristics, motivations and activities since they intertwine state, market and society influences within single organisations. Understanding current trends in the adoption of social enterprise and hybrid concepts and approaches by (social) housing organisations, the reasons for these trends and their implications for organisations which frequently ‘face several ways’ (to state, market and society) are important tasks for researchers in housing studies. Such work is necessary both to improve our theoretical understanding of these trends and their meaning and also enable us to engage with contemporary policy and practice. Yet to date there has been very little systematic analysis within this field.Following an introduction by the Chair, each speaker will draw on their research on social housing organisations in parts of Europe, the United States and Australia to illuminate the following plenary panel questions:- How and to what extent do housing organisations engage with debates about social enterprise and hybridity?- How do they position themselves vis-à-vis the state, the market and society?- How do they reconcile conflicting logics of ‘common good’, financial return and government policy?- How do these conflicting logics play out in housing policy and implementation in different national and local contexts?The plenary will conclude with a panel discussion of similarities and differences in conceputalisation and practice of social enterprise and hybridity in Europe, North America and Australia. This will help us to address the final questions:- How useful are models of social enterprise and hybridity in analysis of organisational behaviour in the housing sector in these different contexts?- What are the policy implications of the growth in social enterprise and hybridity?> La communication est traduite en français par Mme Solange Hibbs (directrice du Département Centre de Traduction, d'Interprétation et de Médiation linguistique (CETIM) de l'université Toulouse II-Le Mirail, membre de l'Association Internationale des Interprètes de Conférence-AIIC).
Mot(s) clés libre(s) : logement social (financement), mixité sociale, offices publics d'habitation, politique de l'habitat, politique du logement, politique sociale, sociologie du logement

Mot(s) clés libre(s) : cohésion sociale, logement social (France), mixité sociale, pauvres (logement), politique du logement (France), ségrégation urbaine, urbanisme (aspect social)

Social mix strategies in urban renewal: paradoxical effects ? / Christine Lelévrier [version avec traduction simultanée en français]. In "Mixité : an urban and housing issue? Mixing people, housing and activities as urban challenge of the future", 23ème colloque international de l'European Network for Housing Research (ENHR), organisé par le Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire Solidarités, Sociétés, Territoires (LISST) à l'Université Toulouse II-Le Mirail, 5-8 juillet 2011. Plénière 4 : Approaches, pratices and challenges of mixité in different urban contexts, 7 juillet 2011.Social mix is a powerful category of housing and urban policies in France. The idea that urban and social diversity is a condition for a “balanced” and “peaceful” city life is not new and almost as old as urban planning and social housing. But, the strength of this notion has increased since the middle of the 1990’s. As in other countries, (the French) national government and local authorities consider social mix as a condition for community cohesion and social inclusion, a sort of public answer to poverty and ethnic concentration in cities and more recently, as a principle for sustainable development and territorial equality (Fenton, Turnstall, 2006). As in other countries as well, housing and especially social housing on one hand, area-based policies on the other hand, are the main public tools for implementing social mix strategies. In 2003, an ambitious urban renewal programme, focused on deprived neighbourhoods and based on housing diversification, followed up the debate about perverse effects of social mix strategies applied to poor areas. - Are urban renewal strategies successfull at diversifying housing and population in the neighbourhoods ?- Does social diversification mean more social capital and social interactions in the neighbourhoods ?- What are the benefits from urban renewal for the inhabitants, the “outsiders” and the “managers” of those neighbourhoods ?The findings from research conducted since 2004 highlight two mains processes of change: re-clustering and fragmentation (Lelévrier, 2010). Those urban and social effects could be seen as paradoxical ones, in reference to social mix public attempts, proceeding from a holistic and dualistic spatial representation of the city and the neighbourhood: instead of mixing, urban renewal just displaces poverty and instead of reenforcing cohesion, it enhances boundaries and distance between social groups. But the assessment could be different if the new private small residences are the opportunity for the “neighbourhoods children”, part of them coming from the immigrant families, to upgrade their residential careers and stay in the familiar neighbourhood while being able to keep social distance… Those changes encountered not national but local social housing managers -a way to stabilize “good tenants”, as well as private one- a way to endow their investments.> La communication est traduite en français par Mme Solange Hibbs (directrice du Département Centre de Traduction, d'Interprétation et de Médiation linguistique (CETIM) de l'université Toulouse II-Le Mirail).
Mot(s) clés libre(s) : cohésion sociale, logement social, mixité sociale, politique du logement, ségrégation urbaine, sociologie de l'habitat, urbanisme (aspect social)